hyphenated -

ornate and ornamental

I have mixed feelings about the book I picked up in July (I think) and only finished yesterday. Yes, it took me the better part of four months to read Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel García Márquez. I'm not a slow reader, but this was a slow book.


The story is not very complicated, but it is told in a meandering and elaborate fashion. The ornate qualities of the book made it difficult for me to be drawn in. Whenever the plot thickened, the author would digress into a prolonged and detailed description of previous, seemingly unrelated, events that introduced new, seemingly superfluous, characters. At these junctures, I felt the urge to skim until the main plot resumed. I wouldn't describe the book as a page turner, unless you were turning the pages to skip to where the plot resumes. 

But I didn't skim or skip any parts of the book due to the aesthetic quality of the prose, which was really the most enjoyable part of the book. The ornamental and rich nature of the writing made the novel deliciously poetic. I didn't want to miss out on any particularly satisfying passages embedded in the author's digressions from the main plot so I was reluctant to bypass any parts of the book. 

In particular, I loved García Márquez's examination of the concepts of memory and nostalgia throughout the novel. Here are some of the passages that stood out:

Everything seemed smaller to him than when he left, poorer and sadder, and there were so many hungry rats in the rubbish heaps of the street that the carriage horses stumbled in fright. On the long trip from the port to his house [...] he found nothing that seemed worthy of his nostalgia. Defeated, he turned his head away so that his mother would not see, and he began to cry in silence.

However, when she thought he was completely erased from her memory, he reappeared where she least expected him, a phantom of her nostalgia. [...] While more recent events blurred in just a few days, the memories of her legendary journey [...] were as sharp as if they had happened yesterday, and they had the perverse clarity of nostalgia.

[...] he realized that the Magdelena, father of waters, one of the great rivers of the world, was only an illusion of memory [...] [F]ifty years of uncontrolled deforestation had destroyed the river [...] the hunters fir skins from tanneries in New Orleans had exterminated the alligators that, with yawning mouths, had played dead for hours on end in the gullies along the shore as the lay in wait for butterflies, the parrots with their shrieking and the monkeys with their lunatic screams has died out as the foliage was destroyed, the manatees with their great breasts that has nursed their young and wept on the banks in a forlorn woman's voice were an extinct species, annihilated by the armored bullets of hunters for sport.

Seeing as the novel was translated from Spanish, I wonder how true the translation is to the original words of García Márquez. Regardless of the authenticity of the words, there were certain phrases or passages, such as those above, that I found myself stopping to re-read. Probably another reason why it took me so long to finish the book.

Filed under  //   books & art   sustainability  

Comments [3]

fall migration

My aching muscles this morning serve as a reminder of the move 1531km south. The distance feels very real having driven a U-Haul for two days down the I-A. I should qualify that statement - Kevin did all the driving. Being a relatively new driver, I thought it best not to be behind the wheel of a 1-ton truck containing all of our possessions, worldly or otherwise. In any case, San Francisco didn't seem very far from Vancouver when flying, but driving across the border and two states into California put it all into perspective.


Through most of Washington and Oregon, it rained. When we entered California, the clouds parted and the sun started shining. A good omen? I hope so. Between the Oregon-California border and San Francisco, we drove behind multiple trucks filled with recently harvested and very fragrant garlic and through long stretches of highway bordered on both sides by olive groves. With garlic and olives being favourites of mine, California gave a very good first impression. 

We also took a detour due to the closure of the Bay Bridge. With no paper maps of the Bay Area, I plotted an alternate route using the maps app on the iPhone and assumed the duty of U-Haul navigator. Sounds like a straightforward task, but rush hour traffic, a wrong exit due to signage conflicting with iPhone instructions, and the setting sun blinding us whenever the road took a turn to the west added a nontrivial amount of stress to the journey. That said, the detour was such that we entered SF over the Golden Gate bridge with the remnants of the sunset over the Pacific on our right, the twinkling lights of the city on our left, and the awesome supports of the landmark bridge overhead. A good reward for our efforts.

Unpacking, the best part about moving (as per my tweet, it's like a birthday where you know in advance what you're getting and everything is slightly used), has been my main focus since we arrived on Thursday. Needless to say, I haven't begun exploring my new neighbourhood and city beyond the nearest coffee shop, fish taco restaurant, and grocery store. That's the next part of the adventure.

Filed under  //   San Francisco   Vancouver  

Comments [2]

"Swinefeld"

On Saturday night, Krista organized a house party for Kevin and I to celebrate our marriage and as a send-off for our imminent move to San Francisco. We had a great time catching up with our friends from Vancouver and Victoria and stayed out late. Needless to say, waking up the next morning to the prospect of packing was a struggle. 

I rolled over and, as I typically do on Sunday mornings, turned on the radio to listen to the Sunday Edition with Michael Enright. And I did so just in time to hear his views on the H1N1 "outbreak", which align with mine almost completely and so I thought I'd share his essay here:

The Swine Flu vaccine arrived this week. You might have heard. The media jumped all over it, treating it like an airlift of warm blankets and hot food to flood-ravaged lowlands in Manitoba. On Thursday, virtually every CBC newscast led with the vaccine story "How To Get It, where to get it, when to get it, who should get it, how often to get it. By the end of the day, the coverage made me want to run screaming to the nearest flu clinic to beg on hands and knees for the needle for me and mine. I kept waiting for reports of refrigerated flu transports being attacked on expressways by terror stricken parents desperate for the precious vials.

 

We are in the grip of a pandemic, all right, but it's not flu it's fear. For weeks, months even, we have been force fed by government and health agencies in print and the electronic media that things, Swine-wise, are going to get very, very bad this winter. Some months ago, a panel of distinguished American scientists warned that the so-called Second Wave could cause between 30,000 and 90,000 deaths by mid-October. In other words, now. This was duly reported as a quote plausible scenario. Close Quote. Canadians have been warned that the Swine Flu numbers could be in the tens of thousands. But with the Niagara of conflicting information, the o-again, off-again impending threat, it is difficult for most of us to know what to believe.

 

For example a television host on a US channel said the Swine Flu virus was and I'm quoting "something we have never seen before in history". He made it sound like some creepy, deadly strain for the planet Zerxes. When in fact H1N1 has been around and mutating since the mid-Seventies. Then there are the numbers. In June, in the US, about 11 weeks into the pandemic, there were 144 deaths. After six months, Swine Flu has killed about as many people as seasonal flu does in six days. In other words, the Swine is less a danger than regular seasonal flu.

 

Next we were told, that the coming winter was when things would get really, really bad. Winter is just ending in Australian and everybody was wondering how Australians managed the Swine; CBC sent a reporter down under. Turns out, the Aussies survived pretty well. Dr. Brian Goldman hosts the ever excellent CBC Radio show White Coat, Black Art. Last month he hosted a gutsy episode called Swinefeld a flu about nothing. He did the math and pointed out that in Australia there were slightly under 200 deaths from Swine Flu in a country of 22-million. By the way, Goldman thinks that refusing to shake hands or bumping elbows, all that protective nonsense, is about as helpful as hiding under a desk during nuclear attack.

 

I'm more than a little skeptical about Swine Flu predictions of doom. And for a very good reason. In 1976, I wrote a 3,000 word magazine piece for Maclean's suggesting that that year's H1N1 outbreak could equal the Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918. Not a career highlight. The virus never got out of the Fort Dixx compound in New Jersey. About 240 soldiers were infected. But about 500 Americans who were vaccinated came down with a disease called Guillain-Barre Syndrome and 25 of them died.

 

Journalists who make predictions about impending heath perils or pass on such predictions have to take great care. Remember what we told you about Y2K; airplanes falling from the skies, elevators crashing to earth? Remember what we told you about the Great Bird Flu pandemic of 2005 and all those deaths hat never happened? Sadly there's no vaccine against panic.

via cbc.ca

Here is the audio file of the entire show for your listening pleasure:

Comments [3]

bye bye Montreal

Amelia Curran's song Bye Bye Montreal seems fitting right about now. I'll be back for Christmas, so "à bientôt" is probably more appropriate than "bye bye". In any case, leaving this great city is never easy.

Comments [0]

fossil fuelish

I wonder what the price of gas would be in the US if the government didn't subsidize fossil fuels... see here for more.


Comments [0]

thinking beyond Copenhagen

We've all seen the graphs and are aware of the expected impacts, the so-called inconvenient truths. In case you need reminding, the following graphics from Seed magazine are worthwhile:

Now that most of the key players have come to accept the existence of climate change, serious talks about addressing it can finally begin. All eyes will be on Copenhagen in December in the hopes that delegates from all around the world will cooperate and deliver an accord with meaningful targets. An overdue step in the right direction on the international stage. Then what?

The goal is to effectuate a change in behaviour at the societal level because, evidently, awareness of the inconvenient truths is not enough. The long line-up of idling cars and SUVs I noticed in front of a school while I was walking Elaine's dog  yesterday afternoon is just one exhibit.

Once targets are established, governments have a limited array of tools to choose from in order to ensure that emissions are reduced appropriately. Regulations. Incentives. Cap and trade. Taxes. Although probably the most difficult to implement, a tax on carbon is likely to be the most effective. Using the case of idling, here's why:

Scenario 1: Regulation
Idling is illegal and all those caught idling will be fined. 
The main issue here is enforcement. Enforcement is expensive and patchy. Case in point: speeding. One would have a difficult time defending the claim that the illegality of speeding is such that it never occurs. And, to make matters worse, carbon emitting behaviour is much harder to define and observe than speeding.

Scenario 2: Incentives
Idling is discouraged and those that purchase and install a devise that cuts power to the engine if the vehicle hasn't moved in over a minute will receive a tax rebate.
In this case, the onus is on the individual to go through the hassle of purchasing and installing the devise. And keeping track of the receipts. And completing the requisite forms (there are always forms). And most people can't be bothered.

Scenario 3: Cap and Trade
Each individual is permitted to emit 600 pounds of CO2 (about half the average) per year from passenger vehicle use. Those that emit more than 600 pounds will need to purchase a sufficient number of emission credits from those that emit less (perhaps by idling less) at the specified rate.
As illustrated in this scenario, cap and trade is really not always feasible at smaller scales. Personal carbon trading has been proposed but, due to obvious logistical barriers, cap and trade mechanisms are typically applied to industrial or national contexts.

Scenario 4: Carbon Tax
A carbon tax is imposed on fuel and gas is more expensive. Individuals can idle, but doing so will be associated with a higher cost.
Assuming that the tax rate specified is appropriate, taxes are a good way of internalizing externalities in a way that induces people to change behaviour. Generally, higher prices will motivate people to rethink their activities and make choices that reduce usage of expensive commodities - like not idling. [1] Taxes also generate revenues so that other taxes, like taxes on income, can be reduced (revenue neutral taxation) or the additional taxes collected can be used to fund other emission reduction initiatives. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Today is blog action day and the theme is climate change. The goal of my post is to serves as a reminder that action to address climate change extends beyond targets set by delegates at large international meetings. If targets are set, governments will need to implement policies to meet them and it is likely that a tax is the best option. Please don't fight it. Support it. 

If you think that your country is doing the right thing by participating in setting emission targets and pledging to meet them, you should also support politicians and parties that take the next, difficult step of designing and implementing a carbon tax.

[1] Some have argued that a carbon tax isn't fair for individuals living in remote communities where personal use of gas is considered unavoidable due to the lack of other options for transportation, but the argument exists that living in remote places is a choice that might need to be rethought if fuel prices are high.

Comments [0]

savoring fall

autumnal [\ȯ-ˈtəm-nəl\adj

  1. of, occurring in, or characteristic of autumn
  2. characteristic of late maturity verging on decline
❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧❧

The sun lays low in the sky and dips below the horizon earlier every day while flora and fauna brace themselves for the first hard frost of the season. Scarves emerge from closest and sandals reluctantly take their place in the darkness. Heavy humidity evaporates and the air alternates between damp and crisp, depending on whether the sky is an endless expanse of glorious blue or a low ceiling of matte, sombre grey. Summer has graciously retired and fall has arrived to advise that winter is en route to aggressively take its place.

In this corner of the world, fall is accompanied by birds noisily announcing their synchronized migration, fields producing the last gifts of the harvest, and trees making bold, fiery statements before going bald. Crimson, copper, gold, and amber leaves tremble and waver in the wind and, when they lose their grip, gracefully float to the ground.

Crunching through leaves along the forest path. The welcome warmth of the sun streaming between branches is subdued and easily stolen by the breeze. Sweet scents of decay rise from the ground along with memories of childhood screeches and giggles from when the chore of raking morphed into a game of diving into a crispy yet soft pile of browning leaves.

Giving thanks for the comforts of home. Heat radiating from the fire. Laughs and stories shared with family and friends. Pumpkin pie and fresh apples. 

     
Click here to download:
savoring_fall.zip (232 KB)

Filed under  //   Canada   family & friends   food   Quebec & Montreal  

Comments [1]

when chicken is an institution

As many readers of this blog know, I'm not a big meat eater. When I do eat meat, I tend towards organic/small farm options. However, there are rare exceptions. One of those exceptions is barbecued chicken. And not any barbecued chicken, only Châlet Bar-B-Q rotisserie chicken.

Like most cities, Montreal has its specialities when it comes to food, namely bagels, smoked meat, and rotisserie chicken. I never really got on the smoked meat bandwagon (I like it, but there's something fundamentally wrong with a sandwich that contains more meat than bread, in my opinion), but I'm all over the bagels and the rotisserie chicken. 

Rotisserie chicken is the only of the aforementioned specialities that is quebecois to the core, as the other two have Jewish roots (Montreal is the home to the second largest Jewish community outside of Israel, after NYC). The argument could be made that my fondness for rotisserie chicken is in my blood, as my surname would have been Beauchamp-Berthelet if our society was matriarchal rather than patriarchal. 

The ubiquity of rotisserie chicken in Quebec is epitomized by la sauce. When someone says la sauce in Quebec, they are most likely referring to this sauce, which was developed by les frères Berthelet (the brothers happen to be my great uncles, but I've never met them - I'm not on the gravy train).

When it comes to rotisserie chicken, Châlet Bar-B-Q in NDG is an institution. Recently voted the best rotisserie chicken in Montreal, Châlet Bar-B-Q doesn't seem to have changed much since it opened over sixty years ago. The decor is classic, with wood panelling on the walls, dim lighting, booths, and waitresses in outdated uniforms. And the chicken, served with fries, gravy, and a toasted bun, is unbeatable. Kevin and I went for lunch earlier this week and were not disappointed. If you're visiting Montreal, be sure to add Châlet Bar-B-Q, along with Schwartz's and St-Viateur, to your list of places to visit.


Photo owned by alanah.montreal (cc)

Filed under  //   family & friends   food   Quebec & Montreal  

Comments [2]

mutant sock puppets

Last month, we were at a friend's wedding. After the ceremony and before the reception, the bride's brother hosted a casual garden party. Sitting around in the yard and chatting with friends from school, the topic of toe socks somehow came up. 

My friend Jonn happened to be wearing a pair and began signing their praises. He listed all the reasons why toe socks were better than regular socks. And then he took off his shoe to show us how free his toes were able to move independently of one another. We all cringed. There's something about toe socks that is fundamentally... uncomfortable.

I don't mind seeing bare feet, but socks that enable each toe to wiggle on its own make me wrinkle my nose. Thankfully, socked feet are largely contained within shoes so I can largely ignore the existence of toe socks. Also, I sense that I'm not alone in my views regarding toe socks so I don't think I need to worry about conventional socks being completely replaced by toe socks. And, as a result, cute sock puppets need not worry about becoming scary-looking mutants.

Once Jonn revealed his freely wiggling socked toes, Kevin brought up the emergence of Five Fingers, a new line of shoes by Vibram that transfer the principle behind toe socks to the realm of footwear. More cringing.

Kevin has been interested in Five Fingers since he was made aware of their existence and, since then, I've been staunchly against them. I have even threatened not to be seen in public with him if he decided to buy a pair and wear them on the street. Unlike toe socks, toe shoes cannot be ignored - one cannot wear Five Fingers discretely or secretly. They're right out there.

In my mind, Five Fingers make the Birkenstock-sock combo fashionable (assuming that the socks are conventional socks and not toe socks). Even if Five Fingers are superior to normal shoes from an orthopaedic perspective, any benefits are overshadowed by their absolute hideousness. I know that my repulsion to toe socks and Five Fingers is completely irrational. My sense of aesthetic rarely trumps practical considerations, but my aversion to feet in gloves is an instance where aesthetics take precedence. 

Filed under  //   family & friends   science & technology  

Comments [2]

proverbial oysters and emoticons

I'm bracing myself for major change. Tomorrow is my last day of work and then I'm off for the next 365 days. I have no plans beyond moving to San Francisco. The world is my oyster. I'm hoping that I don't develop an allergy to shellfish.

Like not seeing the forest for the trees, I've been so focused on the logistics of the change itself that I almost lost sight of the underlying reason for it: being together. Kevin and I have been apart for six months. We've been keeping in touch via Skype, Gchat, and Twitter and there's been some travel between San Francisco and Vancouver, but I'm sick of long distance. 

Beyond the challenge of connecting over a bad connection (yes, the reference is to AT&T) or the frustrations of instant messaging with someone when the computer being on doesn't imply that they are necessarily sitting in front of it (hey! [long pause] hello? [long pause] are you there? [no response]), living two separate lives is difficult. I want to be there for Kevin and I want him to be there for me and, most of the time, emoticons just don't cut it. Technological advances have made long distance more bearable, but there's no substitute for a real hug.

But in two days, I won't have to rely on parentheses, colons, lesser than symbols and 3's, x's and o's, etc. any longer. It's all still sinking in, but the forest is coming into focus ;)

Filed under  //   San Francisco   Vancouver  

Comments [2]